When Suna East MP Junet Mohamed stood before a public gathering in Kakamega and casually disclosed that lawmakers received financial inducements during the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, he did more than entertain the crowd. He pulled back the curtain on the raw transactional mechanics of Kenya’s legislative process.
Capitalfm.co.ke
While political rally rhetoric often fades quickly, a formal public admission of bribery by the National Assembly Minority Leader carries profound legal, constitutional, and institutional consequences.
This second installment analyzes the legal exposure facing lawmakers, the institutional dilemmas confronting watchdog agencies, and the broader political fallout shaking Kenya’s political landscape.
1. The Legal Dilemma: Self-Incrimination vs. Parliamentary Immunity
Can a sitting Member of Parliament face criminal prosecution for publicly boasting about legislative bribery? The answer lies at the intersection of constitutional privileges and anti-corruption statutes.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION VS. CRIMINAL STATUTE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Parliamentary Privileges Act vs. Bribery Act No. 47 of 2016 │
│ ──────────────────────────── ────────────────────────── │
│ • Protects statements made • Penalizes receiving or │
│ INSIDE the chamber floor. offering financial gains.│
│ • Does NOT cover statements • Applies to public │
│ made at political rallies. admissions of corruption.│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Under Article 115 of the Constitution of Kenya and the Parliamentary Pensions and Privileges Act, MPs enjoy immunity for statements made on the floor of the House during debates. However, this legal shield does not extend to public political rallies.
By making the admission during a political convention in Malava, Junet effectively waived parliamentary privilege. Under Section 5 of the Bribery Act (No. 47 of 2016), requesting, agreeing to receive, or accepting a financial advantage to influence an official duty is a severe criminal offense punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment, steep financial fines, and disqualification from public office.
2. Institutional Heat on EACC and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Junet’s confession places immense pressure on independent oversight bodies, specifically the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI).
The Legal Burden on Watchdog Agencies
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PUBLIC CONFESSION │
│ Senior lawmaker publicly names “Accounting Officer” for │
│ legislative payouts on video. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OVERSIGHT OBLIGATION │
│ EACC / DCI mandated under Article 252 to initiate │
│ investigation into official misconduct. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SYSTEMIC RISK │
│ Failure to summon named officials exposes watchdog bodies │
│ to charges of selective enforcement and political bias. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Because Junet specifically named Kericho Senator Aaron Cheruiyot as the alleged manager of the payout pool, legal analysts note that the EACC has sufficient grounds to open a preliminary inquiry. Failing to summon both lawmakers for formal statement recording risks weakening public trust in state anti-corruption mechanisms.
3. Impact on Judicial Petitions and Impeachment Appeals
Junet’s remarks come shortly after the High Court rendered its verdict on Gachagua’s impeachment appeals. While the bench led by Justice Eric Ogola upheld the constitutional validity of the impeachment outcome, it awarded Gachagua Sh50 million in damages after finding that the Senate breached his fundamental right to a fair hearing by refusing a short trial adjournment.
Capitalfm.co.ke
+ 1
Legal Dimension High Court Ruling Impact of Junet’s Public Confession
Fair Hearing (Art. 50) 50M KES awarded due to procedural haste in Senate. Confirms defense claims that trial speed was driven by external motives.
Integrity of Process Impeachment outcome upheld as constitutionally valid. Strengthens appeals argument that the vote was tainted by illegal financial influence.
Public Trust Reaffirms parliamentary power to remove executive officers. Subverts public perception, framing the vote as a transactional exercise.
Gachagua’s legal team can leverage this public admission in ongoing Appellate Court filings. In administrative law, proving that a legislative body was swayed by improper financial inducements can serve as grounds to argue that the entire vote was procedurally flawed and void ab initio (from the beginning).
4. The Political Fallout: Re-alignments Ahead of 2027
Beyond the courtroom, Junet’s comments expose a shift in Kenya’s coalition dynamics.
Normalized Political Transactionalism: By framing the alleged payouts with humor—mocking colleagues for spending their money in Nairobi nightlife rather than building homes—the speech reflects how financial bargaining has become openly normalized in broad-based government politics.
sifafm.co.ke
Mount Kenya Resentment: In Mt. Kenya, Gachagua’s allies are using the confession as evidence that their regional leader was targeted through coordinated legislative buying power rather than genuine governance failures.
Opposition Realignment: While ODM leaders defend their broad-based alignment with President William Ruto’s government, opposition figures like Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna are using separate platform rallies to criticize government policies, highlighting internal friction within the new political arrangement.
sifafm.co.ke
Conclusion: A Precedent for Legislative Accountability
Junet Mohamed’s Kakamega speech will likely be remembered as a defining moment of political candor in Kenya’s 13th Parliament. By laying bare the financial mechanisms behind one of the most significant constitutional events in recent history, he has challenged Kenya’s judicial, investigative, and political systems to address the line between legislative bargaining and illegal corruption.
