Can Kenya’s Clean Cooking Ambitions Survive the KOKO Collapse?

Christopher Ajwang
3 Min Read

When KOKO Networks filed for administration on January 31, 2026, it didn’t just fire 700 people; it sent a shockwave through the international carbon market. The company was the first in the world to be backed by a carbon-linked political risk insurance policy from the World Bank’s MIGA. Now, that insurance policy is about to be tested in what could be the biggest climate-tech legal battle of the decade.

 

1. The “Double Counting” Deadlock

At the heart of the shutdown is a technical but lethal dispute over Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.

 

The Conflict: To sell carbon credits to international buyers (like airlines under the CORSIA scheme), KOKO needed a Letter of Authorisation (LoA) from the Kenyan government.

 

The Government’s Stance: The Ministry of Environment reportedly balked at the request, fearing that if KOKO sold these “emission reductions” abroad, Kenya could not count them toward its own national climate targets (NDCs).

 

The Result: This bureaucratic deadlock froze KOKO’s primary revenue stream. Without the credits, the company was losing roughly KSh 100 on every liter of fuel sold.

 

2. The Return of the “Charcoal Economy”

The immediate winner of the KOKO shutdown isn’t a competitor—it’s the illegal charcoal trade.

 

The Scale: KOKO was displacing an estimated 5 tons of CO2e per household per year. With 1.5 million households losing access to ethanol, Kenya faces a sudden surge in charcoal demand.

 

Health Costs: The Ministry of Health estimates that indoor air pollution contributes to over 21,000 deaths annually in Kenya. KOKO’s exit puts millions of women and children back at risk of respiratory illnesses caused by wood smoke.

 

3. What Happens to the Infrastructure?

KOKO leaves behind a massive, dormant physical network:

 

3,000+ Fuel ATMs: These high-tech “KOKO Points” are currently offline, sitting in small neighborhood shops across the country.

 

Smart Stoves: Over a million households own KOKO-branded stoves that are now expensive “paperweights” unless a new fuel provider can pivot to use the same canisters.

 

The Administration Process: As the company enters administration, there is a slim hope that a deep-pocketed energy giant—such as Vivo Energy or TotalEnergies—might acquire the assets. However, any buyer would face the same “carbon credit”The $179M Insurance Claim: What KOKO’s Collapse Means for the Future of Carbon Finance hurdle that killed KOKO.

Share This Article
error: Content is protected !!