A political earthquake is rumbling through Trans Nzoia County, but its tremors are being felt across the entire nation. The shocking revelation by local MCAs that they were offered substantial bribes to impeach Governor George Natembeya is more than just a local scandal—it’s a stark microcosm of the systemic corruption threatening Kenya’s democratic foundations.
When elected officials stand before cameras to detail how much their votes cost, we must ask: what does this say about the state of our governance?
The Anatomy of a Failed Coup: Cash, Conspiracies, and Courage
The scheme unraveled not in the chambers of the county assembly, but in secret meetings where the currency was cold, hard cash. MCAs described a sophisticated operation where intermediaries—allegedly acting for powerful figures—presented impeachment as a simple financial transaction.
“We were shown envelopes containing up to Ksh 500,000,” revealed one MCA, capturing the blatant nature of the attempt. “The message was clear: your signature has a price tag.”
What the plotters underestimated was the moral fortitude of these representatives. Rather than comply, the MCAs chose transparency, exposing not just a bribery attempt but the fragile state of our political ethics.
Beyond Trans Nzoia: A National Pattern of Political Mercenaries
This isn’t an isolated incident. From Nairobi to Mombasa, county assemblies have become battlegrounds where governors fight impeachment wars not based on performance, but on who can muster the largest “war chest” to either defend themselves or attack opponents.
The Trans Nzoia case is particularly significant because:
-
It Quantifies the Problem: Putting specific figures (Ksh 300,000-500,000) to the corruption makes it tangible and undeniable
-
It Reveals the Methodology: The use of intermediaries, hotel meetings, and upfront cash payments shows a well-established playbook
-
It Demonstrates Citizen Impact: Every shilling spent on political manipulation is a shilling stolen from healthcare, roads, and education
Governor Natembeya: Target or Reformer?
Governor Natembeya’s response has been characteristically bold. The former Rift Valley Provincial Commissioner turned politician suggested the plot stems from his administration’s anti-corruption stance.
“When you start plugging revenue leaks and demanding accountability, you make powerful enemies,” Natembeya stated, positioning himself as a reformer facing resistance from entrenched interests.
This narrative resonates deeply with citizens tired of corruption, potentially transforming a political crisis into a powerful legitimacy boost for the governor.
The Real Victims: Trans Nzoia Residents
While politicians maneuver, the true cost is borne by ordinary citizens. The time, energy, and resources spent fighting these political wars represent stolen focus from delivering essential services.
A teacher in Kitale put it bluntly: “While they’re counting bribes in Nairobi hotels, our schools lack textbooks. This is why development stalls.”
A Watershed Moment for Accountability
The MCAs’ courage has created a pivotal moment for Kenyan institutions. The EACC and DCI now face a critical test: will they pursue this case to its logical conclusion, identifying and prosecuting the masterminds behind the bribery attempts?
Civil society organizations are already demanding action. “This isn’t just about Trans Nzoia,” declared one activist. “This is about whether Kenya will allow our democracy to be auctioned to the highest bidder.”
Conclusion: The High Cost of Cheap Politics
The Trans Nzoia impeachment plot reveals the uncomfortable truth that in Kenyan politics, principles often have price tags. But the MCAs who refused to be bought have shown that integrity can still triumph over inducement.
As investigations proceed, this case may become a landmark in Kenya’s fight against political corruption—a reminder that when citizens and honest leaders stand together, no amount of money can buy their democracy.
